That’s a position backed up by Hany Farid, a professor at Dartmouth and expert in digital forensics and image analysis. That should allow Facebook to find all versions of the video, even if it’s been edited. Those frames are then given their own signature known as a hash.īy storing hashes, they can be compared to other videos on the platform. The company even turned to video hashing, which breaks videos into keyframes. Generally, platforms like Facebook rely on artificial intelligence to identify what videos need to be removed. On March 21, Facebook then created a blog post explaining how it handled videos of the Christchurch shooting. In the original 24 hours after the shooting broadcasted, Facebook removed 1.5 million videos globally, of which 1.2 million were blocked at upload. One copy of the video on Instagram initiated the platform’s “Sensitive content feature.” Still, the video had been viewed more than 8,000 times and was only taken down after CNN showed it to Facebook on Wednesday. Each of them had originally been put up the week of the attack. Eric Feinberg - a founding member of the Global Intellectual Property Enforcement Center - found nine videos. Now, a CNN report reveals videos of the shooting can still be found on both Facebook and Instagram. The shooter live-streamed the event on Facebook, and since then, the company has been scrambling to remove copies of it across its platform. On March 15, at least 50 Muslims were killed in two New Zealand mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand.
0 kommentar(er)
